Volume 42, 2021 - problem 1: Europe and also Slavery: Revisiting the impact of Slave-Based tasks on europe Economies, 1500-1850. Guest Editors: Tamira Combrink & Matthias van Rossum


This write-up presents the very first methodologically grounded calculation the the weight of Atlantic slave-based tasks in the Dutch economy of the second half of the eighteenth century. In this period, the dutch Republic was one of the most developed commercial societies in Europe. The import, processing and also export the slave-produced items such as sugar, coffee and also tobacco played vital role in this economy. In 1770, 5.2% that the GDP of the netherlands Republic and also 10.36% that the GDP the its richest province Holland was based upon Atlantic slavery. In this year, 19% of netherlands imports and (re-) exports contained goods developed by the enslaved in the Atlantic. These high percentages were dependent ~ above the prominent duty that the netherlands Republic and the district of Holland in particular played in Atlantic slavery-based commodity chains. This chains ran from the provisioning of servant ships in the dutch Republic, through the slave trade, to the plantations, the transfer of tropical assets to Europe, their handling in the dutch Republic, to their last export to the europe hinterland. As much as 40% of all the development of the economic climate of Holland in the decades about 1770 have the right to be traced earlier to slavery.

You are watching: How did the dutch profit from the slave trade


In this article, we assess because that the first time the prestige of so late eighteenth-century Atlantic slave-based activities to the dutch Republic"s gross domestic product.1 The inquiry of how much europe societies acquired from their involvement in various aspects of Atlantic slavery has long been contentious, both in scholastic journals and also in society much more broadly, in the Netherlands and internationally. Some of the problems relating come the dutch Republic are typical to the discussions that complied with the publication of Eric Williams’ seminal Capitalism and Slavery.2 these centred on exactly how slavery contributed to capitalism in general and also whether the gains indigenous the servant trade to be so great that they could be established as the necessary problem for Britain"s rule as the world"s earliest industrialising nation. The arguments spilled over to the Netherlands even though the dutch Republic, like its successor the Kingdom that the Netherlands, was not very early industrialiser. However the discussion of capitalism and also slavery is appropriate for the dutch Republic, i m sorry left a big imprint top top the history of pre-industrial capitalism, and throughout the early modern period had actually an progressed maritime and also (financial) business sector. Moreover, netherlands involvement in Atlantic slavery stretched end two and also a fifty percent centuries.3 It included the slave trade and also plantation production in Atlantic colonies, and in the food of the eighteenth century go through successive bouts of quick growth.4

The dispute on the prestige of slavery in the netherlands Republic"s economy stands out for the almost complete absence of discussion around which analytical structure should it is in applied and also which data examined.5 This is in significant contrast come the level the sophistication v which financial historians have actually addressed the inquiry of slavery"s meaning in the brothers economy. The only partial exemption to this has actually been the conflict on the profitability and potential influence of the slave trade top top the netherlands economy, which has recently been revitalized in an influential write-up by Karwan Fatah-Black and also Matthias valve Rossum.6 However, together we will certainly show, if it to be obviously of an essential importance to the presence of the Atlantic enslavement system, the servant trade played just a minor role in the Dutch metropolitan economy. David Eltis, Pieter C. Emmer and also Frank D. Lewis have approximated that its contribution to dutch national revenue was as tiny as 0.5%.7 us will display why the servant trade is no a great indicator that the total contribution the slave-based activities to the netherlands economy, no one a reliable proxy for the adjust in this share over time. General conclusions around the prestige of slavery for the economy based upon the profit or even the all at once size the the slave trade room partial in ~ best and misleading at worst. A much more comprehensive strategy is essential to make systematic estimates the the donation of slave-based activities to the netherlands economy.

Interestingly, an effort to comprehensively estimate the total income indigenous slave-based tasks was undertaken in the 1730s, return it just examined the city the Amsterdam. In an cotton memorandum, which can now be discovered in the archive of the mayors the Amsterdam, the author estimated the Suriname, the Netherlands’ most vital Atlantic plantation colony, contributed fl.2,238,755 per year to the city"s income. This figure was based upon calculations that had income from the profession in sugar, coffee and cacao, the domestic processing industry and a wide range of provisioning markets for the abroad colony and also for the merchant fleet offer the trade.8 that course, the record only concerns a solitary colony and also a solitary city, and also the approximates made by this eighteenth-century observer have to be approached v caution, due to the fact that his clear aim was to solicit municipal assistance for those involved in the Suriname trade. Nevertheless, the file shows the contemporaries were well aware that the financial importance of slave-based activities went well past the servant trade, and even the servant trade together with the trade in products that were created on the plantations. The author"s conclusion was the ‘no functioning man have the right to be found in Amsterdam … who does not earn a piece of bread indigenous this colony’.9 This bold hypothesis has crucial repercussions. When a large section the the Dutch populace never came into direct call with plantation slavery, numerous branches of the economic climate as a entirety or in component revolved approximately commodities the were created by slaves in the Atlantic people or were created for the upkeep of plantations or the slave trade. Very closely estimating the scope of all the tasks involved in moving, processing and also retailing the goods derived from the forced labour carry out by the enslaved in the Atlantic world will permit us to see much more plainly in what ways the benefit from enslavement percolated through the dutch economy. Through linking this to known approximates of netherlands GDP in this period, we will get a better sense of the financial weight of Atlantic slave-based activities and also improve our knowledge of the circulation of slave-based earnings in different sectors the the netherlands economy. Because that a substantial number of wage labourers, earning the ‘piece of bread’ stated by the anonymous writer might have associated them intentional or unknowingly to the enslaved in Suriname and also other dutch colonies, and in non-Dutch nests such together Saint Domingue, i beg your pardon was among the main suppliers that slave-produced goods to the Dutch economy until the enslaved revolted in 1791 and brought an end to the trade. For a much smaller segment the the population, Atlantic slavery was not simply the source of a item of bread, yet of good fortune. A far-ranging part the the eighteenth-century Dutch upstream was proactively engaged in financing, insuring, organising and enabling the slave system, and drew lot wealth indigenous it.

This write-up presents a calculate of the relationship of slave-based activities in dutch GDP for 1770. In order to do this, we have related ours data to the per-sector approximates of the GDP of Holland in the early modern-day period that were released in 2011 by jan Luiten van Zanden and Bas van Leeuwen.10 The result is a verifiable assessment of the financial weight of Atlantic slave-based activities in the netherlands economy. We conclude the slave-based activities contributed as much as 5.2% to netherlands GDP in 1770, and as much as 10.36% in the richest district of Holland. Such amounts are in no feeling marginal or small. A recent research report from economic experts at the Erasmus college in Rotterdam concluded the Rotterdam Harbour, including all dependency logistics, industry and financial services, represented 6.2% of dutch GDP in 2017.11 financial experts of the united state Bureau of Economic analysis have estimated that the digital economy contributed 6.5% to American GDP in 2016, concluding that this made the ar a ‘notable contributor come the as whole economy’.12 The huge contribution that slave-based activities to netherlands GDP becomes much less surprising as soon as we think about that a staggering 19% (expressed in value) of the netherlands Republic"s trade in 1770 included Atlantic slave-produced items such as sugar, coffee, or indigo, either together raw commodities or re-exported ~ undergoing residential processing. Substantial annex accompanying this article, released on the slavery & Abolition website, offers the basic data, such as the trade estimates just mentioned, as well as the methodological basis because that calculating contribute to GDP. In the article, we will situate our approach in international debates, present the flaws in earlier speculations about the function of slavery in the netherlands economy, provide a broad overview of ours methods and a sectoral failure of the outcomes, and finally study what our calculations for the single year 1770 have the right to tell united state in qualitative terms about the potential affect of slave-based activities on the development of the Dutch economic situation in the second fifty percent of the eighteenth century.

See more: How Do “Global Teens” Differ From Teens Of Other Generations As A Result Of Commoditization?

The international debate

There is in fact not a solitary debate around the economic influence of Atlantic slavery. Under the umbrella of this large problem, historians have actually crossed swords over a wide range of issues, such together the significance of the trade in colonial goods for residential economic growth; the relationship between investments in the plantation system and also European industrial resources formation and capital accumulation; slavery"s impact on technology, institutions, geopolitics, global finance and also systems the accounting; and how enslavement in the lengthy run affected the development of the modern world system.13 every of these arguments has been propelled at the very least in component by public concerns, connected to significant questions around how contemporary societies are affected by and account for their historical involvement in Atlantic slavery.14 To resolve these questions meaningfully, the is important to establish a base line for the economic weight that slave-based tasks within the economic climate as a whole. For this reason, we emphasis here top top a solitary question: the donation of Atlantic enslavement to netherlands GDP. We do not intend to imply that calculating this donation is sufficient to answer any of the major questions elevated here, yet merely sell the calculation as a an essential piece in a larger puzzle.

The controversy on the importance of the servant trade and also the plantation sector because that the domestic economy the European countries is in chin wide-ranging. Slave-based tasks created commodity chains the stretched throughout the globe and had a lasting social and also economic impact on societies in Africa, the Americas, Europe and Asia. A substantial component of the earnings from these chains ended up in europe societies. After all, the whole gigantic edifice the the transatlantic servant trade and American slave-societies was set up mostly to offer the economic interest the merchants and investors in the leading royal states. Virtually 250 year ago, in the 1770s, Edward Long applied his embryonic understanding of commodity chains when he assessed the services of the West Indies because that the brothers economy. The made some rough reconstructions of the income drawn from resources transfers and from different segments of the commodity chain, consisting of the servant trade, freighting the goods created by the enslaved, the insurance sector and also brokerage. On this basis, he arrived at the conclusion that in 1773 the network revenue reaped through Britain native the Jamaican plantation economy was £1,249,164.15 virtually two centuries later, Long"s calculations were taken into consideration by Richard Sheridan in his write-up ‘The wide range of Jamaica in the Eighteenth Century’, bring about a conflict with Robert Paul cutting board – who disputed the insurance claim that Britain had made an extensive gains from its West Indies possessions.16

This debate ended in confusion, partly since of questions around whether or no the superior tax revenues, duties, bounties and military expenditure in defending the priceless West Indies had to be contained in the equation. The answers of course count on how national revenue is defined. Prior to Sheridan, Ralph Davis had currently argued the the increase in manufacturing output in Britain to be undergirded through the country"s royal expansion. He pointed out that while the exports to the europe continent stagnated, the share of exports come Africa and also the americas in Britain"s full exports much more than doubled in the first seventy year of the eighteenth century.17 Sheridan additional submitted the ‘the redirection of profession from continental Europe to the American Colonies … gave accessibility to brand-new sources of main products, new markets, brand-new fields of investment – in sum, the innovations … were both cause and effect the the fundamental locational change in the world"s economy’.18

The debate between Sheridan and also Thomas prove how complicated it is to reach agreement on what should be included when compare incomes acquired from slavery with the size of the national economy. Obviously, the very attempt likewise raised a question around the degree to which the country is the suitable framework in ~ which to record the financial significance that a phenomenon that constantly transcended national and imperial borders. Stanley Engerman determined a quite modest strategy by limiting himself to the benefit of the slave trade. Rather of looking in ~ the British economic climate as a whole, the singled out British resources formation together the crucial factor. While he intended to ‘comment on the Williams thesis’, he had to admit that Williams self had embraced a wider perspective in i beg your pardon the slave trade was simply one indispensable element of the more comprehensive slave-based Atlantic financial complex.19 Engerman concluded that the donation of the profits of the servant trade to British national revenue did not exceed 0.5%, although at their top they represented 10.8% of annual savings.20 together William Darity observed in 1990, the method in i beg your pardon Engerman small the debate over the impact of enslavement to the servant trade would have actually a lasting effect.21 It no only notified the method economic historians in the following years would method the british Atlantic but likewise found numerous followers amongst historians of various other Atlantic empires, consisting of the Dutch.22

In 1983, Barbara Solow released a crucial appraisal that both Engerman"s and Thomas’ downplaying the Britain"s gains from its Caribbean colonies. When Engerman had declared that also if the servant trade had contributed 1% come British national income, which the emphasised was an extremely generous assumption, it to be still economically insignificant. Solow replied that this 1% of national income equalled 39% of complete commercial and also industrial investment.23 She likewise discarded Thomas’ insistence on opportunity expenses by reflecting that the £30–37 million invested in the West Indies would only have developed 15% of the profits generated in the Atlantic slave complex had they been invested in England.24 follow to Solow, the real worry at stake to be a much more comprehensive one, namely that ‘Slavery made much more profits for investment, a larger national earnings for the Empire, and a pattern of trade which strengthened the comparative benefit of the home nation in commercial commodities.’25 adhering to up ~ above this suggestion, Joseph Inikori confirmed that in the an important period native the 1750s to 1776, the whole growth that Britain"s exports might be attributed to Atlantic exports and even compensated for decreasing exports to european markets.26 Inikori likewise hinted in ~ the obvious fact the the relationship in between Atlantic slavery and Britain"s socio-economic advance was multidirectional. The tripling that West Indies imports right into Britain between the 1740s and also 1776 coincided with rapid readjust within British culture itself. The farming West Indies economy, argued Richardson in an short article that showed up side by side with Inikori"s, may have been responsible for almost fifty percent of the development of Britain"s domestically produced exports, and industrially developed goods in particular, in this period.27

The points do by Inikori and also Richardson prefigured a new turn in this debate, which result from a revaluation that the old question about whether trade v the ‘periphery’ mattered come the breakthrough of the British residential economy in the first place. In a seminal article from 1982, Patrick O’Brien denied this, on the communication of the allegedly little size that oceanic profession as a proportion of full economic activities in Britain.28 However, O’Brien clearly reconsidered this conclusion in his later on work, admitting that imperialism and also mercantilism can have contributed substantially to the brothers economy. He currently emphasised the the exploitation of the ameri ‘should no be designated together “peripheral”’.29 This conclusion has actually been shared an ext recently by historians who allude out the spectacular growth of Atlantic trade during the early contemporary period, and also the uneven circulation of the services of this expansion (in regards to both straight revenues and also institutional effects) for different societies in Europe. Thus, Acemoglu, Johnson and also Robinson suggested that: