The Oct. 15, 1927, edition of the Saturday Press struck Minneapolis police chief candid Brunskill because that “banning this document from newsstands.” Brunskill stopped vendors from selling the paper because he said it to be “inciting to riot.” climate the county lawyer filed a restraining order to shut the muckraking newspaper down.

You are watching: What was banned as a result of near v. minnesota?

In the landmark decision in close to v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931), the supreme Court fashioned the an initial Amendment doctrine opposing front restraintand reaffirmed the emerging view that the Fourteenth Amendment integrated the an initial Amendment come the states.

The decision is thought about one the the pillars of American push freedom.

Jay near was the muckraking editor that The Saturday Press. In autumn 1927, close to published a collection of posts attacking several Minneapolis city officials because that dereliction of duty.

The close to Court summarized The Saturday push accusations as charging, “... In substance, that a Jewish gangster to be in manage of gambling, bootlegging, and racketeering in Minneapolis, and that legislation enforcing officers and also agencies were no energetically performing their duties.”

Floyd B. Olson, climate the ar attorney because that Hennepin County,filed a restraining order against the muckracking tabloid, The Saturday Press, in Minneapolis, utilizing a public nuisance legislation that stated the state could shut under "a malicious, scandalous, and also defamatory newspaper, magazine, or other periodical." The can be fried Court overturned the action as unconsitutional front restraint. Olson later became Minnesota"s governor. (Portrait the Olson together governor, public domain)

One of the targeted legislation enforcement policemans was Floyd B. Olson, the Hennepin county attorney at the time and also future Minnesota governor. The filed an action to enjoin publishing of The Saturday press permanently as “malicious, scandalous and also defamatory.” A state court enjoined more publication that The Saturday push under the Minnesota public Nuisance Law.

Government can not restrain the press from publishing, can be fried Court says

The supreme Court reversed, 5-4.

Writing because that the majority, chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes started by affirming: “It is no longer open to doubt the the liberty the the press and also of decided is in ~ the liberty safeguarded by the due process clause the the Fourteenth amendment from intrusion by state action.”

Hughes then recast william Blackstone’s famous definition of press liberty in very first Amendment terms. In his Commentaries ~ above the laws of England (1765–1769), blackstone had characterized “liberty of the press” as consisting of “laying no former restraints upon publications.” introduce to the Minnesota windy Nuisance Law, chief Justice Hughes observed the the law was “the essence of censorship.”

Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote that imposing prior restraints upon publication relating to public police officers is counter to a "deep-seated conviction the such restraints would violate constitution right."

Understood in this terms, the permanent injunction the The Saturday push runs respond to to the conception the liberty deeply installed in Anglo-American jurisprudence:

“The reality that for approximately 150 years there has actually been practically an entire lack of attempts come impose previous restraints upon publication relating come the malfeasance the public officers is far-reaching of the deep-seated conviction the such restraints would certainly violate constitutional right.”

Although individuals can sue close to for libelous remarks, the federal government did not have actually the power to bar publishing of his writings in advance. This would certainly constitute an impermissible prior restraint ~ above expression.

Split decision contains four justices who dissented about definition of push liberty

Justice Pierce Butler and also three various other dissenters rubbish both the close to majority’s check out of the first Amendment’s applicability come the states and its interpretation of the first Amendment.

“The decision that the Court,” servant argued, “declares Minnesota and also every other state powerless come restrain by injunction the service of publishing and circulating amongst the human being malicious, scandalous, and defamatory periodicals the ... been adjudged ... A publicly nuisance. It offers to liberty of the press a definition and a scope no heretofore recognized and also construes ‘liberty’ in the due process clause that the Fourteenth amendment to put upon the states a federal restriction the is there is no precedent.

See more: Why Does A Demand Curve Slope Downward Sloping? Causes Of Downward Slope

This write-up was originally published in 2009. James C. Foster is Professor Emeritus that Political science at Oregon State University-Cascades.